Cursor

Coding with an AI assistant has become the default way professional developers work in 2026. But “having Copilot installed” and actually practicing AI pair programming are two very different things. One is a plugin. The other is a discipline. After months of refining workflows with Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Continue.dev across different project types, I’ve collected the practices that genuinely improve output quality — and the habits that lead developers straight into a wall of subtle bugs and security debt. This guide focuses on methodology, not tool comparisons. Whether you’re using a commercial assistant or a self-hosted model, the principles apply. ...

The AI code editor market has matured rapidly. In early 2024, Cursor was essentially the only serious option. By 2026, developers face a genuine three-way choice: Cursor, Windsurf (formerly Codeium), and Cline — each representing a fundamentally different philosophy about how AI should integrate with your development workflow. I’ve spent considerable time with all three. Here’s what you need to know to make the right choice. The Three Philosophies Before diving into feature comparisons, it’s worth understanding what each tool is: ...

AI coding assistants in 2026 have evolved from simple autocomplete tools to sophisticated coding partners. The best AI coding assistants—Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codeium, Windsurf, and Supermaven—now handle multi-file refactoring, understand entire codebases, and automate complex development workflows. When comparing Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Codeium, developers must evaluate AI code completion accuracy, context window size, and multi-file editing capabilities. GitHub Copilot leads with 20 million users and broad IDE support, while Cursor excels at project-wide context and agentic coding. Free AI coding tools like Codeium offer unlimited completions, making AI-assisted development accessible to every developer. ...