The terminal emulator is the tool most developers use constantly but rarely reconsider. Many pick one in their first year and never switch. But the terminal landscape has changed dramatically — GPU-accelerated rendering, built-in multiplexing, and image protocols have made older terminals feel sluggish.
This guide compares eight terminal emulators across platform support, features, and real-world developer experience.
The Quick Answer
| Terminal | Platform | GPU Rendering | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ghostty | macOS/Linux | ✅ | macOS users wanting native feel |
| WezTerm | Cross-platform | ✅ | Cross-platform + Lua config |
| Kitty | macOS/Linux | ✅ | Power users, image protocol |
| Alacritty | Cross-platform | ✅ | Minimalists pairing with tmux |
| iTerm2 | macOS | ❌ | macOS users wanting GUI config |
| Windows Terminal | Windows | ✅ | Windows developers |
| foot | Linux (Wayland) | ❌ | Wayland minimalists |
| Rio | Cross-platform | ✅ | Rust enthusiasts |
A Note on Input Latency
Input latency — the delay between keypress and character appearing on screen — matters for developer experience. However, reliable latency measurements are difficult to produce and vary significantly based on hardware, OS, compositor, display refresh rate, and measurement methodology.
A community benchmark by moktavizen on GitHub tested several Wayland terminal emulators on older hardware (ThinkPad T430, Linux) using the Is It Snappy camera-based tool. In that specific test, foot and Alacritty showed the lowest latency, while WezTerm and Ghostty were higher. However, these results are specific to one hardware/OS/compositor combination and should not be taken as universal rankings.
In general, all GPU-accelerated terminals listed here provide responsive typing under normal conditions. The perceptible difference between them is small for most developers.
Ghostty — Native Feel on macOS
Ghostty went from a side project to one of the most discussed terminal emulators in 2025. Built in Zig, it prioritizes platform-native integration.
What makes it stand out:
- Native platform integration. On macOS, it uses AppKit — not a cross-platform toolkit. Window management, tabs, and splits feel like a first-party Apple app
- Fast rendering with GPU acceleration and efficient input handling
- Sensible defaults. Works well out of the box with minimal configuration needed
- Excellent font rendering on macOS via Core Text
Limitations:
- No Windows support (and none currently planned)
- Configuration is deliberately minimal. No scripting or complex keybinding logic
- Relatively new. Occasional edge cases with unusual escape sequences may occur
Config example (~/.config/ghostty/config):
font-family = JetBrains Mono
font-size = 14
theme = catppuccin-mocha
window-padding-x = 8
window-padding-y = 4
Minimalism is a feature here — the entire config can be a few lines.
WezTerm — Best Cross-Platform Terminal
WezTerm is the go-to choice for developers who need the same terminal on macOS, Linux, and Windows — and want it to be genuinely capable on all three.
Strengths:
- Lua configuration is a superpower. Dynamic tab titles, custom key tables, workspace switching — all programmable
- Built-in multiplexer that eliminates the need for tmux in many workflows
- Image protocol support (iTerm2 + Kitty protocols)
- SSH integration with multiplexing — remote sessions feel seamless
Configuration power (~/.wezterm.lua):
local wezterm = require 'wezterm'
local config = wezterm.config_builder()
config.font = wezterm.font('JetBrains Mono')
config.font_size = 14.0
config.color_scheme = 'Catppuccin Mocha'
-- Dynamic tab title showing current process
wezterm.on('format-tab-title', function(tab)
local title = tab.active_pane.title
if tab.is_active then
return {{ Text = ' ' .. title .. ' ' }}
end
return title
end)
return config
Limitations:
- Higher input latency than some competitors — community benchmarks consistently place it behind Alacritty and foot
- Larger memory footprint compared to more minimal terminals
- Lua config is powerful but adds complexity. Simple tasks can require non-trivial configuration
Kitty — The Power User’s Choice
Kitty has been the GPU-accelerated terminal to beat since before it was trendy. It’s opinionated, feature-rich, and performant.
Standout features:
- Kitty image protocol is the most widely adopted terminal image standard. Tools like
ranger,yazi, andneovimuse it - Kittens — small programs that run inside the terminal.
kitten sshprovides SSH sessions with full terminal feature support - Layouts and splits without needing tmux
Considerations:
Kitty is powerful, but its development style is opinionated. Documentation can be terse, and breaking changes between versions are not uncommon. For teams that value stability and gradual upgrades, WezTerm may be a safer choice.
Alacritty — Still the Minimalist’s Pick
Alacritty does one thing: render text fast. No tabs, no splits, no multiplexer. Pair it with tmux or Zellij for those features.
In 2026, Alacritty remains the right choice when:
- tmux or Zellij is already part of the workflow
- The goal is minimal overhead between shell and screen
- Terminal image support is not needed
It’s not the right choice for those wanting a complete terminal experience out of the box.
The Ones to Skip (for Most Developers)
iTerm2: Still popular on macOS, but it lacks GPU rendering and community benchmarks show notably higher latency compared to GPU-accelerated alternatives. The main remaining advantage is the GUI preferences panel for those who prefer graphical configuration.
Hyper: Electron-based terminal. High latency makes it impractical for heavy terminal use.
Tabby: Also Electron-based. Attractive UI, but the same fundamental latency limitations apply.
Recommendations by Platform
On macOS: Ghostty for native feel and performance. WezTerm if cross-platform consistency is needed.
On Linux: Kitty for power users. foot for Wayland minimalists. WezTerm for those also using macOS or Windows.
On Windows: Windows Terminal is genuinely good and actively maintained. WezTerm is the alternative for cross-platform config sharing.
Font Recommendations
The biggest visual improvement often isn’t the terminal — it’s the font. Some well-regarded options for coding:
- JetBrains Mono — free, excellent ligatures, great readability at small sizes
- Monaspace Argon — GitHub’s font family, beautiful at larger sizes
- Cascadia Code — Microsoft’s offering, pairs well with Windows Terminal
- Iosevka — highly customizable with build-your-own variant support
A good font paired with any GPU-accelerated terminal listed above will provide an excellent coding experience.
Using a terminal not covered here? Reach out at [email protected].